Updated July 2026
Best-For Guide

The Best Dental Software for Orthodontic Practices

We compared 8 ortho-focused platforms across treatment staging, bracket tracking, ceph analysis integration, and Invisalign-style aligner management. Three made our cut. Here is exactly why.

July 2026
14 min read
8 products reviewed
Our Top Pick
9.1Ortho Fit Score

Cloud 9 Ortho

Best overall for orthodontic-focused practices

Cloud 9 is our top pick for orthodontic-focused practices. It is built specifically for orthodontic and pediatric practice management rather than being a general PMS with bolted-on bracket modules.1 Treatment-card workflows and automated appointment sequencing cut the context-switching that plagues generalist platforms, and Cloud 9's integration with Apteryx cloud imaging gives the practice a single database for patient images plus STL-file viewing for clear-aligner cases.2 The patient portal handles consent forms, treatment progress photos, and payment plans in one place, and the interface is modern and fast. Cloud 9 is now part of the Planet DDS cloud ecosystem; note that it is sold by demo on a multi-year term rather than a free trial, which we cover below.
What we liked
  • Purpose-built ortho treatment cards with staging timeline
  • Integrated cloud imaging and STL-file viewing via Apteryx
  • Automated appointment sequences (bond, adjust, deband)
  • Clean cloud architecture, no server overhead
  • Built-in patient engagement portal
What gave us pause
  • No general dentistry module for mixed practices
  • Long 48-month initial term, with an early-termination fee
  • Imaging integration centers on Apteryx rather than a wide range of third-party imaging systems
Starting Price
~$399/mo (est.)
Deployment
Cloud
Best For
Ortho-only
Free Trial
Demo
Runner Up
8.7Ortho Fit Score

Dolphin Imaging & Management

Best for imaging-heavy ortho and surgical planning

Dolphin has been an imaging and cephalometric mainstay in orthodontics for over two decades, and its management module has matured alongside it. Dolphin offers 2D/3D imaging and integrates with digital x-ray units and CBCT systems, so for practices doing heavy cephalometric analysis, 3D treatment planning, or surgical case coordination, few tools match its depth.3 The management side handles scheduling, billing, and patient communication competently, though the interface shows its age in places. Where Dolphin loses ground to cloud-native platforms is architecture and modern UX polish — it still feels like desktop software that happens to have a web portal.
What we liked
  • Deep cephalometric analysis
  • 3D treatment simulation and surgical planning
  • Deep integration with CBCT scanners and intraoral cameras
  • Long track record and an established base in orthodontic training programs
What gave us pause
  • UI feels dated compared to cloud-native alternatives
  • Server-based deployment adds IT overhead
  • Pricing is opaque; requires a sales call
  • Steeper learning curve for new staff
Starting Price
~$450/mo (est.)
Deployment
Server + Web
Best For
Imaging-heavy
Free Trial
Demo only

Get guides like this in your inbox

Practical reads on dental software, vendors, and running a modern practice. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

Budget Pick
8.4Ortho Fit Score

Open Dental + OrthoChart

Best for cost-conscious practices that want flexibility

Open Dental is one of the few open-source PMS options in dentistry, and its orthodontic module (OrthoChart) is capable for the price. OrthoChart is built into the Chart module — you can chart orthodontic hardware such as brackets, wires, and elastics and track treatment progress4 — and it comes with the base license rather than as a separate add-on.17 The trade-off is setup time: you configure your own ortho templates, and imaging relies on third-party bridges. But for a solo orthodontist or a GP adding ortho services, the economics are hard to beat: an initial U.S. rate of $199/month per office (dropping to $149 after twelve months) versus the $400-plus range typical of ortho-specific platforms.5
What we liked
  • OrthoChart built into the base Chart module — no separate add-on fee
  • Open-source flexibility for custom workflows
  • Huge third-party plugin ecosystem
  • Month-to-month after a 12-month initial term
  • Strong community forums for troubleshooting
What gave us pause
  • Requires significant setup and template configuration
  • No native cephalometric analysis
  • Server-based by default; Open Dental Cloud hosting is offered
  • UI is functional but not modern
Starting Price
$199/mo
Deployment
Server
Best For
Budget / Mixed
Free Trial
Full demo DB

Everything Else We Reviewed

We evaluated 8 platforms total. These 5 did not make our top picks but may be worth considering depending on your specific situation.

#4
OrthoTrac (by Carestream)
A long-established ortho platform with strong insurance-billing workflows and an established installed base. Its interface and server-based architecture feel a generation behind the cloud-native field, which is where our lower score lands.
Why it missed: A mature, server-based platform whose roadmap trails the cloud-native field.
8.0
Ortho Fit Score
#5
Dentrix + Ortho Module
One of the most widely installed PMS platforms in U.S. dentistry, Dentrix offers ortho through an add-on module rather than a purpose-built ortho system. In our assessment its ortho treatment planning and bracket tracking trail the dedicated platforms.
Why it missed: Ortho is an add-on module, not a purpose-built ortho system.
7.8
Ortho Fit Score
#6
Curve Dental
A well-regarded cloud PMS, but its ortho-specific workflows are limited — it works for GPs adding basic ortho, not for full ortho practices.
Why it missed: No dedicated treatment staging or bracket tracking.
7.6
Ortho Fit Score
#7
CareStack
An all-in-one cloud platform with a full ortho module — ortho case management, payment plans, and ortho insurance billing — backed by SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certification.6 It is a strong generalist choice; we rank it behind the ortho specialists because its ortho tooling is newer and less battle-tested for high-volume ortho.
Why it missed: Cloud-native and capable, but its ortho tooling is newer than the specialist platforms.
7.4
Ortho Fit Score
#8
Eaglesoft
Solid general PMS but has no meaningful ortho-specific features. Would require heavy customization and third-party add-ons.
Why it missed: No ortho module at all.
7.1
Ortho Fit Score

Our Picks, Compared

A side-by-side breakdown of the three platforms we recommend, scored against the criteria that matter most.

FeatureCloud 9 OrthoDolphin Imaging & ManagementOpen Dental + OrthoChart
Ortho Fit Score9.18.78.4
Treatment StagingNativeNativeVia OrthoChart
Bracket TrackingBuilt-inBuilt-inTemplate-based
Ceph AnalysisVia integrationStrong native supportThird-party only
3D Treatment SimBasicAdvancedNo
Clear-Aligner SupportVia ApteryxYesManual
Cloud NativeYesHybridOptional
Patient PortalBuilt-inBuilt-inVia add-on
Monthly Cost$399 (est.)~$450 (est.)$199
Contract48-month initialQuote-based12 mo, then monthly

Monthly-cost figures for Cloud 9 and Dolphin are TMR estimates: neither vendor publishes ortho pricing, so both are quote-only. Open Dental's $199/month is its published first-year U.S. rate. Ortho Fit Scores are editorial ratings weighted for fit with orthodontic-focused practices; a platform's overall rating in its full review may differ.

Pricing reflects publicly available information at the time of research and may have changed. Verify current pricing directly with the vendor before purchase.

How to Choose

Every orthodontic practice has a different mix of fixed appliances, clear aligners, and surgical cases. The software that fits best depends on your case mix, team size, and how much you value imaging versus workflow automation. Here is how to think through the decision.

Start with your case mix

If your practice is mostly clear aligners (Invisalign, SureSmile, Spark), prioritize platforms with strong integration to those aligner systems and to your imaging. Cloud 9's integration with Denticon, for instance, eliminates the double manual entry of patient data between systems, and its Apteryx link lets staff view aligner STL files without leaving the platform.7 If you run more traditional, fixed-appliance-heavy ortho, bracket tracking and appliance inventory management matter more.

Imaging integration is non-negotiable

Orthodontic treatment planning lives and dies by imaging. If you are doing ceph analysis in-house, Dolphin is the clear winner. But if you outsource ceph tracing or primarily rely on intraoral scans, a modern cloud platform with good scanner integration (iTero, 3Shape) may be the better investment.

Multi-location considerations

If you operate more than one location, cloud-native software eliminates the VPN headaches and server-replication costs of traditional setups. Cloud 9 is built for multi-location orthodontic, DSO, and pediatric groups and reports use across roughly 2,300 locations.8 Open Dental can work multi-site through Open Dental Cloud hosting,9 but it adds complexity and cost.

The mixed-practice question

If you are a general dentist adding ortho services (a growing trend), you need software that handles both GP and ortho workflows. Open Dental is the strongest choice here because it is a full-featured general PMS with an ortho add-on. Cloud 9 and Dolphin are ortho-specific and would require running two systems for a mixed practice.

What about switching costs?

Data migration is the hidden cost of switching orthodontic software. Treatment staging history, appointment sequences, and imaging archives all need to move cleanly. Budget two to four weeks of parallel operation and expect some data loss on custom fields. Cloud 9 and Dolphin both offer vendor-assisted migration; Open Dental relies on community-supported import tools that require more technical comfort.

Red Flags: What to Avoid

  • Vendors that won't publish pricing. If you have to "schedule a demo" just to learn the ballpark cost, the pricing is built around a sales conversation rather than transparency. We weigh opacity in our scoring.
  • No data export capability. If a vendor cannot export your patient data in a standard format (ADA-compliant or HL7), you are locked in. Walk away.
  • Per-provider pricing that scales steeply. Per-provider fees can add up. As an illustration, if a platform charges a few hundred dollars per additional provider, a three-doctor group can pay far more than the sticker price — so always ask for the multi-provider quote before signing. For contrast, Open Dental charges $20/month per provider beyond the first three.10
  • Server-only platforms with no cloud roadmap. In 2026, a vendor with no path to cloud deployment is often underinvesting in its product. Ask directly about the cloud roadmap before committing to a server-only platform.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best orthodontic software for a solo practice?

+

For a solo orthodontist, Cloud 9 Ortho offers the best balance of ortho-specific features and ease of use without IT overhead. If budget is the primary concern, Open Dental with OrthoChart gives you solid ortho capabilities at an initial U.S. rate of $199/month per office, on a 12-month initial term that then continues month-to-month.11

Can I use general dental software for orthodontics?

+

You can, but you will hit friction quickly. General PMS platforms like Dentrix and Eaglesoft lack dedicated treatment staging, bracket tracking, and aligner integration. If ortho is more than roughly a third of your case mix, purpose-built or ortho-enhanced software will save significant time per patient.

How much does orthodontic software cost?

+

Published ortho pricing is scarce. Open Dental lists an initial U.S. rate of $199/month per office, dropping to $149 after the first year.12 Cloud 9 and Dolphin do not publish ortho pricing; a third-party directory lists Cloud 9 starting around $500/month,13 while Dolphin is quote-only15 — treat both as estimates and get a written quote. Contract terms vary widely: Cloud 9's standard agreement runs a 48-month initial term,14 whereas Open Dental is a 12-month initial term that then continues month-to-month.12 Budget for migration (a few thousand dollars is typical for vendor-assisted moves; our estimate) and one to two weeks of staff training.

Is cloud-based ortho software secure enough for HIPAA?

+

Generally, yes. Cloud 9's terms state it will endeavor to maintain industry-standard privacy and security practices, and commit both parties to entering a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with covered-entity practices as required by HIPAA.16 Reputable cloud platforms use industry-standard encryption in transit and at rest, and cloud hosting can be more secure than a self-hosted server that depends on the practice's own IT and patching discipline. Ask any vendor for its specific security documentation and a signed BAA.

How long does it take to switch orthodontic software?

+

Plan for 4-8 weeks end-to-end: 1-2 weeks for data migration, 1-2 weeks for staff training, and 2-4 weeks of parallel operation. Cloud 9 and Dolphin offer vendor-assisted migration; Open Dental migrations rely on community tools and may require more hands-on technical work.

Sources

Backed by 7 sources · 2 independent

  1. Cloud 9 / Planet DDS — SaaS Agreement and Terms of Use
  2. Planet DDS — New Integrations: Cloud 9, Denticon and Apteryx (May 2024)
  3. Software Advice — Dolphin Management profile
  4. Open Dental — Ortho Chart feature page
  5. Open Dental — Fees for Support and Services
Show all 17 sources
  1. CareStack — Orthodontist Software page
  2. Planet DDS — New Integrations: Cloud 9, Denticon and Apteryx (May 2024)
  3. Software Advice — Cloud 9 Ortho profile
  4. Open Dental — Fees for Support and Services
  5. Open Dental — Fees for Support and Services
  6. Open Dental — Fees for Support and Services
  7. Open Dental — Fees for Support and Services
  8. Software Advice — Cloud 9 Ortho profile
  9. Cloud 9 / Planet DDS — SaaS Agreement and Terms of Use
  10. Software Advice — Dolphin Management profile
  11. Cloud 9 / Planet DDS — SaaS Agreement and Terms of Use
  12. Open Dental — Fees for Support and Services

Figures are compiled from the sources listed and may change as those sources update. Spotted an error?

This guide is based on independent research. Read our methodology. Something look off? Let us know.