Market Intelligence Report:
CHICAGO, IL (60613)
A comprehensive analysis of the dental competitive landscape in ZIP code 60613, including provider density, specialty mix, growth trends, and strategic opportunities for practice owners.
This market shows a moderate level of competition with moderate underlying opportunity based on demographic and provider data.
In markets like this, practices with a defined wedge — niche, experience, or specialty — tend to outperform undifferentiated peers.
Higher than 73% of similar ZIPs nationally
Provider density is near national norms — competition is real, and clear positioning tends to separate practices more than raw capacity.
71% in-state
Higher than 27% of similar ZIPs nationally
Demographic and demand signals indicate viable room for the right operator, though not a greenfield.
20% in-state
Visibility data is not yet available for this ZIP.
Executive Summary
- Moderate opportunity (52/100) — competitive but viable for the right operator
- Moderate competition (65/100) — provider density near national norms
- Saturated: 1 dentist per 917 residents (national avg: 1:1,680)
Market Health Score
A balanced competitive field where positioning and niche choice, not capacity, tend to decide outcomes.
If helpful, we can connect you with providers that specialize in improving visibility and patient acquisition in markets like this.
Provider Breakdown
As of the latest data, there are 56 active dental providers registered under NPI in the 60613 ZIP code. This includes both individual practitioners and organizational NPIs. Of these, 20 are solo practitioners and 36 are group or organizational entities.
| Specialty | Providers | % of Market |
|---|---|---|
| General Dentistry | 49 | 87.5% |
| Prosthodontics | 3 | 5.4% |
| Other Specialty | 1 | 1.8% |
| Orthodontics | 1 | 1.8% |
| Endodontics | 1 | 1.8% |
| Pediatric Dentistry | 1 | 1.8% |
1 specialty gap detected in CHICAGO: periodontics. These represent underserved demand based on the local demographic profile.
The provider mix is broad on general dentistry but thin on periodontics — a structural gap where specialty-led positioning faces less direct competition than a generalist play.